Where Are the Democrats?

Trump is all over the news.  He has been aggressive, overwhelming.

The Democrats have mostly been missing.  It’s as though since they have no power in Congress to stop Trump and the Republicans, they don’t know what to do.  They held their silly paddles up during Trump’s State of the Union speech, and they have sputtered individually about various Trump actions.  The Party has not organized anything,

This is not the way to win back the hearts and minds of disaffected middle-class Democrats who voted for Trump, nor the many Republicans who voted for Trump, holding their noses, because of their concern with the economy,  

Democrats usually speak to their base.  But what the Party needs to do now is speak to those who voted for Trump in the last election; it needs to establish a line of communication with them. And it needs to find a way of speaking to Trump voters effectively. .

In communicating, the Party needs to establish a presence on social media as well as the internet and cable TV.  Too long has the Party allowed the Republicans to dominate the information war by having only a weak presence in the new media.

Whenever Trump or one of his minions does something that harms the Trump voter, that breaks a promise he made to them, the Party must make sure that Trump voters know what Trump is doing and its impact on them—clearly and effectively.

When he does something that violates the Constitution, especially its checks and balances, the Party must—after explaining the importance of the checks and balances, America is not a monarchy—counter Trump’s view that the courts or Congress have no power over his “legal” actions.

Besides doing this using a rapid response style, daily if necessary, the Party should have a once-a-week news conference—again using social media, etc.—to review Trump’s actions of the week and how those actions harmed the interests of Trump voters.

And it is important that these communications be directed clearly to Trump voters.  Democrats must show them that it is the Democratic Party that cares for them, not the Republicans. Republicans have used and abused them, especially on the economy.  

To do this successfully, the Party must be more than the anti-Trump. They must present a positive vision for the country and the policies that flow from it that resonate with the hearts and mind of the American people.  See my post, "What Does the Democratic Party Stand For."

The Republican Party has always been the party of big business, not the worker.  And Trump has been true to form.  Trump's actions since the inauguration have been to further the interests of corporate America, not the average American.

These communications will not be lost on the Democratic base.  It will hear these broadcasts and be energized by what the Party is doing and saying.

The Party must start laying the base now for reclaiming Congress in the 2026 midterm elections.

 

Trump’s Destruction of Government

 It’s clear now that Trump’s goal is nothing less than the destruction of the Federal government, both regarding most of its functions and the balance of power set by the Constitution.

Functions:  Trump’s actions show that he thinks the Federal government has only two functions:  protect the country and support business … oh, and requiring adherence to culture war issues at the state and local level, including education..  All other agencies—not just those areas that advance liberal causes— have been gutted, both regarding staff levels and programs.  It’s not just the EPA and DEI functions or even USAID.  It’s almost everything with the exception of Defense, Commerce, Homeland Security, and related agencies. Even Social Security.

This is more drastic than anything he proposed during the election campaign.  The agencies won’t have the staff or funding needed for the agencies to fulfill their mission, effectively eliminating them.  This is also true for what he terms “anti-business” functions of otherwise protected agencies, such as combating fraud and corruption, auditing business tax returns, and regulating business for the public good, which Trump views as  “liberal” agendas.

The result of these cuts to staff and programming is that the welfare of the people will be significantly impacted—negatively. They will either not get the services they need and previously got or corporations will be able to do what they want even if it is harmful to the interests of the public.

This is far different from the usual and accepted practice of a change in administration altering the nuance of government.  That is, a Republican administration was always more pro-business than a Democratic one.  But the Republican administrations, while replacing political appointees with people supporting Republican policy positions, rarely dismantled programs and never an agency.  So one could switch administrations without major disruption or harm to the government and the people.

If Trump is allowed to carry out his plans—and we can look only to the courts to stop him—even if the next administration is Democratic, it will be extremely difficult to restore the government to  anything close to its former state.  It will take many years and a huge expenditure of funds to hire necessary staff and restore the services that people have come to expect and depend on from the government.

There is little argument that the Federal government could use some cutting back, both in staff and programs.  But instead of doing this carefully based on what works and what doesn’t, Trump and Musk are doing this on an ideological basis and using a chainsaw approach.  At this point, it is hard to say whether the country will be able to recover from Trump’s actions and, if so, how long that might take.

Balance of Power:  While it was always clear that Trump wanted to increase the power of the presidency, the extent of his power quest is now clear.  He sees himself as a King, with both Congress and the courts being subservient to him.  And he will brook no disagreement.

While he has said that he will abide by the decision of the courts, he means only the Supreme Court—and that, not because of the Constitutional position of the Supreme Court but because he thinks that with a conservative super-majority, several appointed by him, they will rule in his favor.  But that is open to question.  We shall soon see.  The Supreme Court refused Trump’s request to freeze USAID funds and sent the case back to the District Court for further findings.  That court has now ordered Trump to present a schedule for payment.  

In the meantime, he has not followed a number of lower court orders, which will in all likelihood also end up at the Supreme Court, the most flagrant of which involves the deportations of Venezuelans in flagrant violation of the District court’s order not to deport them.  After Trump called the District Court judge a “radical left lunatic,” and he and his allies called for his impeachment, Chief Justice Roberts issued a rare public statement that impeachment is not appropriate when one disagrees with a decision.  (See my post, “The Constitutional Crisis to Come.”)

If the courts are not successful in stopping Trump, even if the’26 midterms result in a Democratic controlled House and Senate, they will not be able to undo the damage that Trump has done and will continue to do because Trump will veto their efforts, and they are unlikely to have the votes necessary (⅔ of the House) to override a Presidential veto.  That work will only start with a new Democratic administration, hopefully, in 2028.

All the Democratic Party can do now is call Trump out on anything he does that either hurts the average person, goes against his campaign promises, or upsets the Constitution’s balance of power system.  And this the Party has not systematically done.  But they must speak out,,and if necessary on a daily basis, in order to keep the impact of Trump’s actions in front of the public, in front of the voters, laying the groundwork for regaining control of Congress in 2026.

The Trump Magnet - It's All About Power

It'ss no secret that for many ambitious people in our culture, it's all about obtaining as much money and power as possible.  And people do all sorts of unethical or questionable things in order to gain money and power.  This is nothing new.

But in any dictatorship, you have an added factor thrown in.  You have a leader who has or desires absolute power and will brook no disagreement with, nor even discussion of, his plans.  In such a culture, people seeking power and secondarily money know that to be given power, they must bow to the dictator, flatter him, and support him without any questions.

And that is why we see a host of people in Washington who grovel before Trump and do his bidding without any questions.  Even when the position Trump takes is diametrically opposed to an important position that they have taken in the past.

Perhaps the most egregious example of this is Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House.  A year ago when he was fighting Far-right members of his caucus over aid to Ukraine, he put himself on the line, risking his Speakership, by insisting that the budget include a large aid package for Ukraine.  He, like so many Republicans in Congress and out, viewed Russia as the aggressor in the war as well as our enemy for decades.  For him it was a matter of principle to provide aid to Ukraine.  Now, he has done a 180º,  parroting Trump's statements claiming that the Ukraine was the aggressor and that Zelensky is a dictator.and should thank President Trump for his help.

It is sad to see what has, at least for the moment, happened to the promise of American democracy and our founding documents.  Not only are we no longer the shining city on the hill to the rest of the world, we are no longer the protector of the health and safety of our citizens, especially the weaker and poorer.  We've never been really good about protecting the environment, which supports our life on Earth, but under Trump, environmental protection is viewed as an enemy.

Despite his campaigning as a protector of the people, especially the middle class, he has shown himself to be what in truth he has always been—a man enamored of wealth and major corporations—and his goal is to support their wellbeing.  This is what his kind of king does. 

The Constitutional Crisis to Come

Donald Trump has set out on a course to radically reshape our government and our democracy.  In doing so, he is and will be violating many laws, both those passed by Congress and those in the Constitution.  

With a compliant Congress, more than 100 suits have been filed in Federal court to stop what Trump is doing.  Many judges have issued temporary retraining orders advising Trump to stop his actions.   It is unknown to what extent Trump is respecting those orders.  In at least two instances, the court has found that Trump has not followed the orders and has restated very clearly that he must do so.

The normal process in civil cases like these is that the lower court order would not be stayed while the matter is being appealed.  And appeal Trump certainly will, as he has recently said that if he is acting to save the country, he is not breaking any law—even if, in fact, he is acting contrary to the law.

The first two cases have now been appealed to the Supreme Court; one concerns Trump's wanting to fire the head of the Office of General Council, an independent watchdog agency with a term set by Congress and not serving at the President's pleasure.  The other concerns Trump's freezing $2 billion in foreign aid payments.

One would hope in these and other power-grabbing cases, both Justices Roberts and Barrett, and perhaps Gorsuch, would join the 3 liberal judges in declaring that Trump had broken the law and acted illegally.

The question then is, "What will Trump do?"  In the first case, he would have no choice but to abide by the Court's ruling because he has no way of forcing the person out of office.  But in the second and other cases, although he has said that he will abide by the Court's ruling, his other recent statement noted above and those of Vice President Vance raise a question regarding that.  

What happens if he doesn't abide by the Court's ruling?  The possible scenarios are not pretty.  If the Executive branch does not submit to the Judicial branch of government as foreseen in the Constitution's checks and balances, we would indeed be in a crisis.  It could come down to the same question as in other dictatorships—the military.  Does the military support the President or does it support our democracy and Constitution?

One can only hope that Trump is not so full of himself that when push comes to shove, he will relent and not foment a civil war.