There is much societal strife in this world, and the reason comes down to one of two things: either a country or group has something we want or wants something we have, or we feel threatened by the otherness of the other, that we cannot be safe while the other has potential power over us.
I laid out my thoughts on this issue in a previous post, “The Destructive Impact of Our Us v Them Perspective.” But the current edition of the National Geographic, which explores the issue of race, affirms the need for another post on this topic.
The us v them perspective, contrary to the thoughts of many, is not human nature. As with so many things, it is the result of human development; of our life experiences. We were not born with this perspective. It is an emotional response by our ego-mind. We live in a very antagonistic, very competitive world, so that response is not surprising. It is a vicious circle; a perpetual motion machine.
It is true that we see this same behavior in animals … fighting for territory, food, mates. There is a fight for survival that is hard-wired into both animals and humans. That is nature not nurture. But as with other biological imperatives, man’s ego-mind has morphed these reactions into obsessions, cravings.
When an animal needs to fight, it fights; otherwise it goes about its life unperturbed. Humans, however, obsess about their fears, their insecurities, real and imagined. And those obsessions filter all experiences, making it impossible to see things as they really are. So we find it almost impossible to break out of the vicious circle.
The fact is, however, that we are all, each and every one of us, descended from a small band of human ancestors that first walked the earth in Africa 300,000 years ago. Over time, they multiplied and spread throughout Africa. Perhaps 120,000 years ago, they started crossing into the Middle East. From 45,000 - 70,000 years ago they moved into Europe and Asia, at which point they interbred with Neanderthals and other species. Later still, 15,000 - 20,000 years ago, they crossed from Asia over to North America and made their way down into South America.
How can we make such a definitive statement about those events? The timing comes from anthropological discoveries, and so it will be subject to change from discoveries yet to be made. That we all have a common ancestor comes from the evidence in our DNA.
DNA analysis of people from around the world shows irrefutably, that “all non-Africans today are descended from a few thousand humans who left Africa maybe 60,000 years ago.” DNA also tells us that the different colors of our skin occurred later in response to environmental conditions in different parts of the world where man settled.
Race is defined as, “a group of persons related by common descent or heredity.” Or alternatively, “People belonging to the same stock.” And so, in the broadest sense, there is only one race, and that is the human race. There are instead many different cultures, each with their own distinguishing characteristics, physical and otherwise, strengths, and weaknesses. The term “race” has unfortunately been used frequently to imply something that is not based on science; it has been politically/socially motivated.
Many cultures are partly defined by skin color and other physical features. Often they are connected to a particular geographic region, and even a particular country. But we are all one race.
Biologically, there is no evidence whatsoever that a man born into one culture is inherently smarter or more able than a man born into another one. That is a function of nurture, not nature, which is why within each culture there is such a huge diversity in the abilities of individuals.
Yes, some cultures are intellectually more developed than others, but that is also a function of nurture, not nature. There is nothing inherent in the intellectual stature of a culture, as seen by the way that aspect has ebbed and flowed over the centuries. For example, while Europe was in the Dark Ages after the flowering and then demise of the Greek and Roman empires, Asia flourished with intellectual and scientific achievement. During the Middle Ages, the Muslim world flourished while Europe was still struggling to emerge from its darkness. Both South America and Africa had highly advanced civilizations before the advent of white men into their territories.
If one claims that one culture is more civilized than another or more God-fearing than another, that depends on how one defines civilization and God. All cultures are civilizations and all cultures have their God. And if the Western Judeo-Christian white man is so civilized, why does he consistently act in such uncivilized, inhumane ways both towards his fellow man, even his family members, let alone those of other cultures?
So once and for all we must disabuse ourselves of the idea of race and racial difference. As to cultural differences, we all suffer from the same human failings. We each have our aspects of civilization, and yet we each act in decidedly uncivilized, inhumane ways. We each have had periods of intellectual growth and we each have had periods of intellectual decline or stagnation. None is inherently superior to the others. .
No comments:
Post a Comment